Tommy Robinson handed 5-year stalking order after harassing journalist

English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson has been given a five-year stalking protection order after he shouted abuse outside the home of a journalist and threatened to repeatedly return to her address.

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, went to the property of The Independent home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden and her boyfriend, Samuel Partridge, in January of this year.

Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard he stood outside Ms Dearden’s house and shouted unsubstantiated allegations about Mr Partridge.

Deputy chief magistrate Tan Ikram said that Robinson’s behaviour “crossed the line between mere harassment and stalking” at a hearing on Wednesday.

The court previously heard how Robinson had hired a private investigator to find information out about Ms Dearden following a request for comment she made, through his solicitors, on a story alleging that he misused money donated by his supporters.

Tommy Robinson court case
Deputy chief magistrate Tan Ikram said that Robinson’s behaviour “crossed the line between mere harassment and stalking” (Jonathan Brady/PA).

Mr Ikram said that after learning Ms Dearden’s address, Robinson had arrived around 10pm, calling for her to come to the door and shouting claims that Mr Partridge was a paedophile.

The magistrate “wholly rejected” that Robinson had attended the address to “exercise his right to reply” to the article, saying that he had been there to intimidate her and adding there was “not a shred of evidence” that the claims about Mr Partridge were true.

“The complainant refused to come out or engage with the defendant,” he said.

“The defendant reacted by saying that he would come back to her address ‘every night’.

“In my judgment, that crosses the line in this case between mere harassment and acts associated with stalking in that he threatened to repeatedly return to her home address.

“The defendant was arrested before he could carry out his threat.

“I find that the intention of the defendant turning up a journalist’s house at past 10pm was clear: to intimidate her.”

Mr Ikram also rejected Robinson’s claim he had been “calm” throughout the incident, saying that it contradicted other undisputed witness accounts from neighbours.

He said Robinson had “pursued a course of conduct” to intimidate Ms Dearden while she was carrying out “legitimate investigations.”

“In acting as he did, his actions sought to coerce and control the complainant in his desire to stop her going about her lawful business,” he said.

He added: “Ms Dearden has said she felt extremely shaken, distressed and unsafe and afraid to go outside,” he said.

“The defendant clearly poses and continues to pose a risk to the complainant’s physical and psychological wellbeing.”

Robinson, who attended court in person and wore a dark corduroy shirt and dark trousers, walked out of the courtroom part way through the hearing and did not return as the order was passed.

Under the conditions of the order Robinson is prohibited from contacting Ms Dearden or Mr Partridge, or attending any places where they live and work, unless specifically invited for interview.

He is also prohibited from publishing any material concerning, or making any reference to Ms Dearden or Mr Partridge, directly or indirectly, on any websites, on social media, or in print.

Robinson will be able to respond to the judgement and future articles written by Ms Dearden with “legitimate comment” but without reference to his allegations against Mr Partridge.