Virgin O2 £31bn merger under in-depth investigation by watchdog
An in-depth investigation into the £31 billion mega-merger between Virgin Media and O2 has been launched by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
The Phase 2 investigation will be launched immediately and comes following a request from the companies for the watchdog to give the deal the green light quickly.
Under a “fast-track” process, investigators from the CMA will look at whether the deal could lessen competition for UK customers of the mobile phone and broadband giants.
The CMA said it is “concerned that, following the merger, Virgin and O2 may have an incentive to raise prices or reduce the quality of these wholesale services, ultimately leading to a worse deal for UK consumers.”
Previously the CMA blocked a merger between O2 and rival network Three, although it has previously waived through BT’s deal with EE.
The decision to launch a fast-tracked investigation comes where “there is sufficient evidence at an early stage of the investigation for the CMA to conclude that there is a realistic prospect that the transaction would result in a substantial lessening of competition in one or more markets”, it said.
Evidence will be submitted by the networks’ parent companies, Liberty Global, which owns Virgin Media and Virgin Mobile in the UK, along with Telefonica which owns O2.
The merger, first announced in May, would bring together O2’s 34 million customers on its mobile network with Virgin’s 5.3 million broadband, pay-TV and mobile users.
The deal values Virgin Media at £18.7 billion and O2 at £12.7 billion.
At the time the deal was announced the companies said it will create a “full converged platform” for customers and will invest £10 billion in the UK over the next five years.
The CMA was only granted permission to investigate the deal after the European Commission handed over the case in November.
Under European law, the biggest mergers are generally dealt with by the commission’s regulators in Brussels.
But the CMA asked Brussels regulators to hand the case back because it primarily only impacted UK customers and that any findings would come after the Brexit transition period had ended.