Children half as likely to contract Covid-19, review of global studies concludes
Children and young people could be half as likely to catch coronavirus than adults, a scientific review of studies from around the world has suggested.
Researchers found those aged under 20 had 56% lower odds of catching SARS-CoV-2, the official name of the coronavirus which causes the disease Covid-19, from an infected person.
But the review of global test and tracing and population screening studies, led University College London (UCL), said evidence “remains weak” on how likely children are to transmit the virus to others.
Researchers also concluded they did not have sufficient data to examine whether children under the age of 12 differed to teenagers in terms of susceptibility to the virus.
Lead author of the research, Professor Russell Viner of the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, said it was the “first comprehensive study” to review what is and is not known about “susceptibility and transmission” among children.
He said: “Our findings show children and young people appear 56% less likely to contract Covid-19 from infected others.
“Susceptibility is a key part of the chain of infection, and this supports the view that children are likely to play a smaller role in transmitting the virus and proliferating the pandemic, although considerable uncertainty remains.
“This new data provides essential evidence to governments around the world to inform their decision-making on whether to reopen schools and reduce or end lockdown measures.”
For the review, researchers screened 6,332 studies and identified 18 with useful data.
Nine were contact tracing studies from China, Taiwan, Japan and Australia, eight were population-screening studies and one was a systematic review of small household cluster contact-screening.
Researchers found that while children appear less likely to catch the virus from others, once they are infected it remains uncertain about how likely youngsters are to pass it on.
Overall they believe their findings imply children play a lesser role in the transmission of the new coronavirus at a population level because fewer of them are likely to be infected in the first place.
The researchers emphasised their non-peer-reviewed study provides no information on the level to which children can transmit the virus if they are infected.
Speaking on a webinar hosted by the Science Media Centre on Friday, Prof Viner said the studies did not allow researchers to separate the data out by the age of a child.
They were also unable to look at whether children from different ethnic minority or economic backgrounds were at higher risk.
Asked about the potential reopening of schools in England next month, Prof Viner said the study was not about this issue, but the data could be used to look at it.
He added: “It’s preliminary evidence, but the weight of evidence I think in summary is clear that children appear to be less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.
“We don’t have any data on transmissiblity. We clearly have a state of uncertainty.
“I believe it is not helpful to make statements about what is safe and not safe as absolutes. All safety is a degree of safety.
“There are safety issues walking out our front door, there are safety issues getting in our car to drive our children to school, we cannot ever say something is safe or unsafe.”
Prof Viner said “the risk of death or severe infection from Covid-19 is exceptionally low in children”.
He said having an “effective test and trace mechanism in place is very important to mitigate the uncertainty about transmission from children”.