Judges consider parents' plea to take Alfie Evans to Rome for treatment

The second most senior family court judge in England and Wales is preparing to analyse the latest stage of the Alfie Evans life-support treatment dispute.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, who in July will become the new president of the Family Division of the High Court, will head a panel of three Court of Appeal judges due to hear arguments about the 23-month-old at a hearing in London on Wednesday afternoon.

Judicial heads announced earlier this week that Sir Andrew, currently Lord Justice McFarlane, would take over from Sir James Munby as the most senior family court judge in England and Wales.

Alfie's parents, Tom Evans and Kate James, who are both in their early 20s and from Liverpool, are appealing against a ruling made by a High Court judge late on Tuesday.

They want to move Alfie from Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool to a hospital in Rome.

Alfie Evans court case
Alfie Evans' mother, Kate James, gives him a cuddle at Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool (Alfies Army Official/PA)

Mr Justice Hayden decided, at a hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in Manchester, that Alfie should not be allowed to travel to Italy.

  • February 20: Mr Justice Hayden rules in favour of hospital bosses at the High Court, accepting medical evidence which shows further treatment is futile
  • March 6: Court of Appeal judges uphold the decision
  • March 20: Supreme Court justices decide the case is not worth arguing and refuse permission for another appeal
  • March 28: The European Court of Human Rights rejects a bid from Mr Evans and Ms James, saying they found no human rights violation
  • April 16: Alfie's parents argue he is being wrongly "detained" at Alder Hey Hospital. Judges at the Court of Appeal in London rule against them and again uphold the decisions of Mr Justice Hayden
  • April 20: The Supreme Court rules against Alfie's parents for a second time, refusing permission to appeal
  • April 23: The European Court of Human Rights refuses an application by Alfie's parents, saying it is inadmissible. A High Court Judge dismisses new submissions by Alfie's parents, and his life support is withdrawn by doctors

Doctors stopped provided life-support treatment to Alfie late on Monday.

Mr Evans said his son had confounded specialists' expectations by continuing to breathe.

Alfie's parents have already lost two rounds of fights, in the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights.

In February, Mr Justice Hayden ruled that doctors at Alder Hey could stop treating Alfie against the wishes of his parents following hearings in the Family Division of the High Court in London and Liverpool.

Specialists at Alder Hey said life-support treatment should stop and Mr Justice Hayden said he accepted medical evidence which showed that further treatment was futile.

Statement from Alder Hey Children's Hospital - https://t.co/K19tRj4g9upic.twitter.com/RirFQg1NIY

-- ? Alder Hey Children's Hospital (@AlderHey) April 24, 2018

Mr Justice Hayden said flying Alfie to a foreign hospital would be wrong and pointless.

Court of Appeal judges upheld his decisions.

Supreme Court justices and ECHR judges refused to intervene.

Tom Evans, father of Alfie who has been at the centre of a life-support treatment fight (PA)
Tom Evans, father of Alfie who has been at the centre of a life-support treatment fight (PA)

The couple then alleged that Alfie was being wrongly "detained".

Mr Justice Hayden dismissed that claim.

Appeal judges have upheld Mr Justice Hayden's decision and Supreme Court justices and ECHR judges said they would not intervene.

Mr Justice Hayden then finalised plans for withdrawing treatment and allowing Alfie's life to end.

Judicial heads announced earlier this week that Sir Andrew would take over from Sir James Munby, who is retiring, as the most senior family court judge in England and Wales in a few months' time.

Read Full Story

FROM OUR PARTNERS