Lord Janner ‘had halo effect, but children were disbelieved’, abuse inquiry told

The late Lord Janner enjoyed “the halo effect” as a prominent politician which meant he was effectively protected from being prosecuted for years amid allegations he abused vulnerable children, an inquiry heard.

Lawyers for the Labour peer’s alleged victims told the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) that there was a “culture of deference” towards Lord Janner.

The former Leicestershire MP died in 2015 having been charged with 22 counts of historic child sexual abuse dating back decades.

He denied the allegations.

Summing up the latest strand of the inquiry, which is focusing not on whether Lord Janner was guilty, but on the institutional responses to the allegations against him, lawyers for the alleged abuse victims accused police and prosecutors of not robustly investigate the claims.

Lord Janner (Jonathan Brady/PA)
Lord Janner (Jonathan Brady/PA)

Nick Stanage, representing several complainants, said Lord Janner was offered “the luxury of a series of timid and incomplete investigations”.

He added: “Over a period of several decades, serious allegations against Lord Janner received nothing like serious institutional responses from Leicestershire Police and the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service).

“The allegations demanded, but never received, thorough and objective analysis.

“Investigations were oddly incurious, culpably feeble, and prematurely terminated with important inquiries still obviously left undone.”

Lawyer Christopher Jacobs said there was “a perfect storm of failure by police, CPS and social services” which blighted the lives of his clients.

He said: “There was a culture of deference towards Lord Janner, a prominent individual who was given the benefit of the doubt at every turn.”

David Enright, on behalf of his client, added: “It appears Lord Janner enjoyed the halo effect of high office, and children the default of disbelief.”

William Chapman, also representing multiple complainants, invited inquiry chairwoman Professor Alexis Jay to “call this what it is – a cover-up”, and said there was “a distinct lack of enthusiasm for pursuing Janner”.

He added: “This investigation has provided striking evidence of how wealth and social status insulated perpetrators of child sexual abuse from being brought to justice, to the detriment of the victims of their alleged abuse.”

Child abuse inquiry
Child abuse inquiry

Danny Friedman QC, on behalf of the Janner family, said there was a risk that the allegations were made by people who “transposed their pain and need for recompense onto Lord Janner”.

He said: “Certain individuals of profile can also become the subject of societal myths and stereotyping.

“In the operations you have looked at, there were concrete grounds for concern that Lord Janner’s very prominence could attract wrongful accusation.”

Edward Brown QC, for the CPS, said staff involved in the Janner allegations “made judgment calls to the best of their ability”.

He said: “There is, we believe, simply no evidence (of deferential treatment) anywhere in the evidence before you.”

Lawyers for Leicestershire County Council and Leicestershire Police said child protection services had vastly improved since the time of the allegations.

No alleged victims of Lord Janner were called to give live evidence during the three-week inquiry strand, which was held largely behind closed doors to protect their identities, although summaries of their witness statements were heard and referred to throughout.

Prof Jay’s report into this strand of the inquiry is due to be delivered at a later date.