Parents of murdered woman win High Court challenge for fresh inquest into death


A fresh inquest is to be held into the death of Susan Nicholson, who was murdered by her boyfriend Robert Trigg, after her parents won a High Court challenge.

Ms Nicholson, 52, was murdered in 2011, five years after Trigg killed another lover, 35-year-old Caroline Devlin, in 2006.

Neither death was initially deemed suspicious by police.

Ms Nicholson’s parents, Elizabeth and Peter Skelton, brought a legal challenge against the senior coroner for West Sussex over the scope of a fresh inquest into their daughter’s death.

Lawyers for the couple claimed the senior coroner was wrong not to order a full inquest into the death, arguing there were police failings in the case which should be examined.

In a ruling on Friday, Lord Justice Popplewell and Mr Justice Jay allowed Mr and Mrs Skelton’s challenge, ruling that a full inquest must take place.

Susan Nicholson ruling
Susan Nicholson ruling

In their judgment, the senior judges said they were not finding that the police “were in fact guilty of any failings, or in breach of the operational duties”.

They said: “Our conclusion is merely that that can credibly be suggested, so that an inquest should look into whether that is so.

“It may find that no criticism of the police is justified, or that any criticisms are isolated failures and not serious. That will be a matter for investigation at the inquest.”

Mr Skelton said the family is “relieved” at the ruling and hope they will now be able to get the answers they need at a fresh inquest.

He told the PA news agency: “We are really relieved now and we feel we are getting somewhere because there will be another inquest and we hope we will get the answers we have been waiting for.

“We might have to wait a few months for the inquest but we are certainly making progress.”

Trigg was jailed for at least 25 years in 2017 for Ms Devlin’s manslaughter and Ms Nicholson’s murder.

After his conviction, the High Court quashed the original inquest into Ms Nicholson’s death, which made a finding of accidental death, and ordered a new inquest be held.

The senior coroner for West Sussex ruled that this would be a fresh short inquest, with no witnesses questioned.

Heather Williams QC, barrister for Mr and Mrs Skelton, told the High Court at a hearing in October that the couple had argued to the coroner that the “circumstances leading up to Susan’s death involved arguable breaches by Sussex Police”.

They said there should be a full inquest under Article 2, the right to life, of the Human Rights Act, which can scrutinise the role of public bodies in a person’s death.

Ms Williams said the couple had argued the force had breached its duty to “take reasonable steps to protect against the real and immediate risk to life posed by Robert Trigg towards Susan Nicholson” as well as its duty to “conduct an effective investigation into a death that may amount to the unlawful taking of life, in relation to Caroline Devlin”.

In her ruling last year, the senior coroner “indicated she was not satisfied there was an arguable breach of either of these obligations and that accordingly she was not obliged to conduct an Article 2 compliant inquest”, Ms Williams said.

Robert Trigg inquiry
Robert Trigg inquiry

It is this decision Ms Nicholson’s parents challenged at the High Court.

The senior coroner remained neutral in the challenge.

Sussex Police, which is an interested party in the case, argued Mr and Mrs Skelton’s claim should be dismissed.

Lawyers for the force argued the senior coroner’s decision was not unreasonable.

Mr Skelton accused the force of making the process “much harder and more stressful” by arguing against the request while “threatening us with a large bill of costs if we had not been successful”.

He added: “We want to know whether Susan’s death could have been prevented, so that this doesn’t happen again and other families don’t have to go through the pain and distress that we have.”

The Skeltons’ lawyer, Alice Hardy, of Hodge Jones & Allen, told PA: “There had been warning signs that Susan was in danger.

“The fight they (the family) have had to go through some nine years after Susan died is extraordinary.

“They should have been treated with more respect by various agencies.

“I hope lessons will be learnt.”

She said Sussex Police’s decision to oppose the case and fight it so “rigorously”, given they were not even the defendant and could have chosen to remain neutral, was “surprising”, causing the family “immense stress and put them at financial risk.”

Trigg was also an interested party in the case, asking the court to make an order that the coroner reach her own conclusion on how Ms Nicholson died and not have to make a ruling in line with the murder conviction.

The judges dismissed Trigg’s application, saying they upheld a ruling made by the coroner last year that “the fresh inquest cannot reach a verdict inconsistent with Trigg’s conviction”.

Ms Hardy said the ruling “clearly rejects” Trigg’s attempts to re-open his case, accusing him of “jumping on the bandwagon” and casting some “pretty insulting aspersions about the two women and their families along the way”.