The boss of Tesco has spoken out to defend the supermarket's stake in a coffee shop business, which appears to be independently owned.
Customers of Harris + Hoole – a chain of coffee shops popping up across London and the south east – reportedly feel duped by the pared-back indie brand image only to discover it is 49% owned by the supermarket giant.%VIRTUAL-SkimlinksPromo%
Harris + Hoole, named after coffee-loving characters in the Diary of Samuel Pepys, has opened 10 coffee shops in and around London since August.
The chain was set up by Australian siblings, Nick, Andrew and Laura Tolley, with a vision to bring quality coffee to the high street.
Harris + Hoole haven't tried to hide Tesco investment, stating on their website that the supermarket made "a non-controlling investment in the new business to allow the Tolleys to realise their dream," yet the actual coffee shops paint a different picture with no indication of the Tesco backing.
Last week, the Guardian reported that many customers felt deceived by the brand. Some reported said they favoured supporting independent cafés over large corporate competitors such as Starbucks and Costa – so felt duped to discover that the seemingly independent Harris + Hoole is owned by high street giant Tesco.
In a blog post on Tesco's website yesterday, chief executive, Philip Clarke said that the business had burgeoned since its launch and that some outlets might be installed in Tesco stores in the future.
"We like backing great brands, helping them to grow and to realise their potential. We've done it with suppliers for years. Great ideas can find it hard to get backing these days, so we're pleased to be in a position to help entrepreneurs achieve their vision," Clarke said.
Clarke continued: "We invested in Harris + Hoole after meeting entrepreneur Nick Tolley and his siblings Andrew and Laura, who are passionate about great coffee. They were looking for a company which could back their vision to bring quality coffee to a wider audience and we were impressed with their energy and enthusiasm. We thought customers would love the coffee and the warm, friendly atmosphere of their shops, so we decided to invest."
Explaining why Harris + Hoole is not Tesco branded, he said: "The H+H brand is part of its value – its distinctiveness and appeal. It's the Tolley's business, their brand. Our investment helps them to take it further."
Clarke said H+H outlets would appear in Tesco stores "when the Tolleys are ready".
Biggest rebranding disasters
Tesco defends stake in 'indie' coffee chain
Tropicana manufacturer PepsiCo wanted to bring the popular orange juice into the 21st century with a new carton.
Unfortunately, when it rolled out its new, more functional cartons in January 2009, the consumer backlash was intense.
After a month, PepsiCo therefore announced that it would return to the old carton with immediate effect.
The linked rings of the Olympic logo are recognised around the world. But the organisers of the London 2012 Games wanted a more modern look.
Unluckily for them, the public did not agree. And when the "ugly" and "childish" logo was unveiled, 80% of respondents to a BBC poll gave it the lowest possible ranking.
Coca-Cola is one of the world's most famous brands. But even it makes mistakes from time to time.
Last year, for example, it decided to roll out Christmas-themed white Coke cans in the US. The bizarre choice of festive colour change - it was, after all Coca-Cola that created the red-coated Santa in 1931 - did not go down well, though.
Not only were Diet Coke fans confused by the similarity to the silver cans they regularly bought, drinkers of Coke were bemused by the lack of red cans on the shelves. The white cans were therefore ditched before Christmas had even arrived.
In a bid to appear more international, British Airways rebranded its fleet and got rid of the Union Jack on its tail-fins in 1996.
Unfortunately, however, Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic was quick to take advantage of the change and slap Union Jacks on its own jumbo jets.
Everyone knows what the Post office does. But when the organisation changed its name to Consignia in 2001, consumers were left confused.
Unsurprisingly, the Consignia brand didn't last long as a result.
In 1993, Barbie and Ken doll manufacturers Mattel wanted to give Barbie's boyfriend Ken a more modern look.
However, "New Ken", with his earring, string t-shirt and purple leather soon became an embarrassment. Dubbed "Gay Ken", he was soon discontinued and recalled.
In 2010, Gap released a new logo designed by Laird and Partners that attempted to keep an element of the iconic logo that has defined the brand for 20 years.
The new look was short-lived, however, with the retailer reverting back to its old logo within a week after negative feedback from customers.
When Andersen Consulting cut ties with Arthur Andersen, it let a marketing consultant choose its new name.
The rebranding is reported to have cost the company $100 million (£63 million), but the name has not proved popular and is regarded as "one of the worst rebrandings in corporate history."
Electrical retailer Dixons was unhappy with its reputation for poor customer service. So it decided to change its name to Currys.digital.
Unfortunately, however, the name has not caught on, with many shoppers still referring to the stores as Dixons anyway.
Gerber is an American baby food manufacturer that, while not a rebranding as such, made the mother of all marketing blunders when it decided to launch a range in Africa decorated with images of happy babies.
The range failed to sell, which is not surprising when you consider that African consumers at the time - many of whom did nit speak English - expected to see pictures of the contents of the tins...