Lidl to be the next supermarket giant?

Is Lidl the next power brand? According to a new survey the cheap-and-cheerful German retailer has more potential than any other high street name to hike its brand popularity.

Comparisons with other once-derided brand names - Skoda, for example - are being made. So, is Lidl the new Skoda (as it were)? And what other brands are on the up?


No Lidl achievement?

The research, carried out by YouGov, took responses from 2,000 UK consumers that gave their view on 50 potential super-brands. And the no-frills supermarket came out top with a 27% share of the vote (full list below). Some turnaround from 2004 when Lidl found itself in the top ten loathed brands, just behind QVC and Pot Noodle.

So, has the recession removed the stigma of shopping at stores that were once a by-word for low-rent cheapness?
%VIRTUAL-ArticleSidebar%

"Shoppers are becoming more comfortable with the idea of a supermarket which sells simply good value produce rather than an ideal or a lifestyle," said Scott Wilkinson from advertising agency Bordello that organised the survey.

Czeching it out

"The word Lidl," he goes on, "may be still met with a snigger but with a rapidly growing market share and a strong business model, come 2015 – much like Skoda – it won't be a laughing matter."

Other fast-growing brands include breakfast and snack operator Rude Health and bespoke tailoring company, A Suit That Fits, a company that claims to makes bespoke tailoring affordable. The black cap taxi app, Hailo, also did well.

However, surveys like these only offer a snapshot. Behind Lidl, be advised, at number two, sits Prince Harry. Advertising agency Bordello claims the reason why the prince sits between a cheap German supermarket and a taxi app is because "he has the human touch and it seems the public are now poised for the year of Prince Harry."

In case you didn't know.

Brands with the most potential for growth


10 PHOTOS
Biggest rebranding disasters
See Gallery
Lidl to be the next supermarket giant?

Tropicana manufacturer PepsiCo wanted to bring the popular orange juice into the 21st century with a new carton.

Unfortunately, when it rolled out its new, more functional cartons in January 2009, the consumer backlash was intense.

After a month, PepsiCo therefore announced that it would return to the old carton with immediate effect.

The linked rings of the Olympic logo are recognised around the world. But the organisers of the London 2012 Games wanted a more modern look.

Unluckily for them, the public did not agree. And when the "ugly" and "childish" logo was unveiled, 80% of respondents to a BBC poll gave it the lowest possible ranking.

Coca-Cola is one of the world's most famous brands. But even it makes mistakes from time to time.

Last year, for example, it decided to roll out Christmas-themed white Coke cans in the US. The bizarre choice of festive colour change - it was, after all Coca-Cola that created the red-coated Santa in 1931 - did not go down well, though.

Not only were Diet Coke fans confused by the similarity to the silver cans they regularly bought, drinkers of Coke were bemused by the lack of red cans on the shelves. The white cans were therefore ditched before Christmas had even arrived.

In a bid to appear more international, British Airways rebranded its fleet and got rid of the Union Jack on its tail-fins in 1996.

Unfortunately, however, Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic was quick to take advantage of the change and slap Union Jacks on its own jumbo jets.

Everyone knows what the Post office does. But when the organisation changed its name to Consignia in 2001, consumers were left confused.

Unsurprisingly, the Consignia brand didn't last long as a result.

In 1993, Barbie and Ken doll manufacturers Mattel wanted to give Barbie's boyfriend Ken a more modern look.

However, "New Ken", with his earring, string t-shirt and purple leather soon became an embarrassment. Dubbed "Gay Ken", he was soon discontinued and recalled.

In 2010, Gap released a new logo designed by Laird and Partners that attempted to keep an element of the iconic logo that has defined the brand for 20 years.

The new look was short-lived, however, with the retailer reverting back to its old logo within a week after negative feedback from customers.

When Andersen Consulting cut ties with Arthur Andersen, it let a marketing consultant choose its new name.

The rebranding is reported to have cost the company $100 million (£63 million), but the name has not proved popular and is regarded as "one of the worst rebrandings in corporate history."

Electrical retailer Dixons was unhappy with its reputation for poor customer service. So it decided to change its name to Currys.digital.

Unfortunately, however, the name has not caught on, with many shoppers still referring to the stores as Dixons anyway.

Gerber is an American baby food manufacturer that, while not a rebranding as such, made the mother of all marketing blunders when it decided to launch a range in Africa decorated with images of happy babies.

The range failed to sell, which is not surprising when you consider that African consumers at the time - many of whom did nit speak English - expected to see pictures of the contents of the tins...

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE


More stories

Read Full Story

FROM OUR PARTNERS